Introduction

As high‑net‑worth investors seek diversification beyond stocks and bonds, two popular alternatives emerge: managed futures and hedge funds. Both aim to deliver returns independent of traditional markets, but they differ markedly in strategy, liquidity and transparency. Understanding these distinctions helps investors choose the vehicle that best aligns with their objectives.

What Are Managed Futures?

Managed futures programs are professionally managed portfolios of futures and forward contracts—agreements to buy or sell commodities, currencies, equity indexes or bonds at an agreed upon future date and price. They are typically run by Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) or Commodity Pool Operators (CPOs) who must register with and are regulated by the CFTC and NFA and SEC . CTAs can take long, short, or neutral positions and adapt quickly to market trends, using systematic strategies such as trend‑following or market‑neutral approaches.

What Are Hedge Funds?

Hedge funds are pooled investment vehicles that employ a wide variety of strategies—long/short equity, event‑driven, relative value, macro and more. They can invest in equities, fixed‑income derivatives, over‑the‑counter (OTC) products and private securities . Hedge funds are generally private placements for accredited investors and often operate offshore to avoid certain regulations. Flexibility and discretion are hallmarks of hedge funds, but this comes with trade‑offs in transparency and liquidity.

Key Differences Between Managed Futures and Hedge Funds

1. 

Investment Universe

• Managed Futures: CTAs generally trade only exchange‑cleared futures, options on futures and forward markets . Because futures are standardized contracts traded on public exchanges, prices are transparent and liquidity is high. In fact, the currency markets are the deepest, most liquid markets in the world.
  
  
• Hedge Funds: Hedge funds trade a broader array of instruments, including fixed‑income derivatives, OTC products and individual equities . This flexibility allows for complex strategies but can involve illiquid or opaque positions.
  
  
• Hedge Funds tend to be more concentrated than managed futures, where hundreds of different contracts are being traded world wide.
  
  

2. 

Strategy and Focus

• Managed Futures: CTAs often employ trend‑following or market‑neutral strategies, relying on quantitative models to ride long or short trends . Their focus is on capturing momentum rather than assessing intrinsic value. Since the approach is technical, it is a repeatable process that is devoid of assumptions and bias.
  
  
• Hedge Funds: Hedge funds pursue many strategies—value investing, merger arbitrage, distressed debt or relative value—based on the manager’s discretion. These may include fundamental analysis, event‑driven trades and leverage. It often depends on a star trader, so often there is management risk.
  
  

3. 

Regulation and Transparency

• Managed Futures: The managed‑futures industry is highly regulated. CTAs and CPOs must register with the CFTC/NFA and provide daily or monthly account statements. In fact, it is one of the most regulated areas in all finance. Investors can view positions and performance in near real‑time , offering complete transparency .
  
  
• Hedge Funds: Hedge funds face relatively less regulatory oversight. Disclosure requirements vary, and transparency is often limited to periodic reports determined by the manager . Investors may not know specific holdings or risk exposures.
  
  

4. 

Liquidity and Lock‑Ups

• Managed Futures: Futures contracts are highly liquid; many managed‑futures funds offer daily or monthly liquidity . There are no lock‑up provisions; investors can typically redeem capital quickly .
  
  
• Hedge Funds: Hedge funds commonly impose lock‑up periods during which investors cannot withdraw funds . Redemptions may be limited to quarterly or annual windows, and some positions are difficult to liquidate quickly.
  
  

5. 

Leverage and Risk

• Managed Futures: Futures employ inherent leverage, but CTAs generally trade on margin (often 5–15% of contract value), which enhances cash efficiency while avoiding borrowing costs . Because futures exchanges manage collateral and mark‑to‑market daily, credit risk is lower.
  
  
• Hedge Funds: Hedge funds often borrow capital or use derivatives to amplify returns. This leverage can magnify gains but also increases credit risk and potential losses, especially in volatile markets .
  
  

6. 

Fees and Minimum Investments

• Both managed‑futures funds and hedge funds typically charge a management fee and performance fee. However, direct CTA programs can require high minimums ($100k or more), while hedge funds may demand even higher commitments. Mutual funds and ETFs that track managed futures provide lower entry points but may still have above‑average fees.
  
  

7. 

Investor Experience

• Managed Futures: Investors can open accounts with a futures clearing merchant and view trading on an up‑to‑date basis, fostering transparency and control .
  
  
• Hedge Funds: Investors must rely on periodic reporting and have less insight into day‑to‑day operations.
  
  

Pros and Cons of Each

Managed Futures

Pros

• Non‑directional: Ability to profit from rising or falling markets .
  
  
• Diversification: Low correlation to stocks, bonds and other hedge fund strategies .
  
  
• Transparency and liquidity: Daily or monthly redemption without lock‑ups .
  
  
• Regulation: Clear oversight by CFTC, NFA, and SEC.
  
  
• Cash efficiency: Futures margins allow higher exposure with less capital .
  
  

Cons

• Reliance on trends: Trend‑following strategies may underperform in choppy markets or reversing markets.
  
  
• Fee structure: Management and performance fees can be significant, though lower in mutual funds than LP’s..
  
  
• Access: Direct investments often require accreditation and high minimums, except in the case of mutual funds.
  
  

Hedge Funds

Pros

• Flexibility: Wide array of strategies and instruments.
  
  
• Potential for outsized returns: Managers can exploit market inefficiencies across asset classes.
  
  

Cons

• Illiquidity: Lock‑ups restrict withdrawals .
  
  
• Credit risk: Leveraged positions increase the risk of loss .
  
  
• Limited transparency: Investors may not see specific holdings .
  
  
• Higher fees: Hedge fund fee structures can be steep.
  
  

Which One Is Right for You?

If you value liquidity, transparency and non‑directional returns, managed futures may better serve your needs. They work well as a diversifier to traditional portfolios, offering the potential for downside protection during periods of market stress. Hedge funds, on the other hand, may appeal to investors seeking bespoke strategies or exposure to illiquid opportunities but require tolerance for less transparency and lock‑up periods. Ultimately, your decision should align with your risk tolerance, investment horizon and desire for control over your capital.

These choices are rarely one-size-fits-all. If you’re uncertain which approach best complements your existing portfolio, Gartenhaus Wealth Management can provide personalized guidance tailored to your unique financial objectives. Contact us to discuss how alternative investments might fit into your overall wealth strategy.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

‍